Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alex Michelsen vs Vit Kopriva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michelsen vs Kopriva analysis and find out who is favored!
Alex Michelsen vs Vit Kopriva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michelsen 0 - 0 Kopriva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michelsen has won 51.39% of points on their second serve, while Kopriva has won 44.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michelsen, in recent form, has won 49.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kopriva has won 53.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 32.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michelsen has saved 59.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kopriva has saved 57.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michelsen has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Kopriva winning 60% (W/L 39/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michelsen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 29/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 163), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Michelsen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.05% of matches (W/L 27/ 11), where as Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michelsen has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.13 while Kopriva has played against players with an average rank of 273.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michelsen has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kopriva has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michelsen has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kopriva has converted 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
60
Rank
60
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
127
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
66% (100-52)
Career Total W/L
59% (344-241)
47% (16-18)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$576,570
Career Prize Money
$372,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alex Michelsen | Vit Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (16/18) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (43/44) | 53% (39/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (411/410) | 51% (353/346) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 56% (9/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 98 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 142 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:30 | 1:46:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 100.91 | 238.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1739/2566) | 63% (1373/2172) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1151/1739) | 69% (941/1373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (425/827) | 44% (352/799) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (96/228) | 47% (99/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (929/2422) | 41% (879/2167) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 58% (11/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (14/30) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 31% (4/13) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 72% (18/13) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 28% (18/5) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 13% (16/2) |
Alex Michelsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Michelsen
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Alex Michelsen
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Taylor Fritz
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
118)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alex Michelsen
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Henrique Rocha
72%
(
73 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Alex Michelsen
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Alex Michelsen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Alex Michelsen
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Vit Kopriva
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Stefano Travaglia
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Mate Valkusz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Coria
73%
(
87 of
119)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michelsen Vs Kopriva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Michelsen are available here and Kopriva photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Alex Michelsen
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
